这是新定义3第10课：
Atthe time, however, she was not only the largest ship that had ever been built,but was regarded as unsinkable,
forshe had sixteen watertight compartments. Even if two of these were flooded, shewould still be able to float.
Thetragic sinking of this great liner will always be remembered, for she went downon her first voyage with heavy loss of life.
老师：
1)was regarded as unsinkable - 是不是省略了to be, 即 was regarded as tobe unsinkable ？
2)Even if two of these were flooded, she would still be able to float. - 这里用了和目前或以后的相反假设，如何理解呢？为何不是和过去来作相反假设呢？
或者说，作者写这篇文章的时候，是站在什么时间角度立场来写这句话的呢？
3)另外，书上说with heavyloss of life是结果状语，可我感觉应该是“随着状语”？
1 as 在此是介词，不能后接不定式。所以不能加to be。 其实这里是省略了动名词being. 即as unsinkable. 注意动名词being几乎一直被省略了，所以介词as后可将来接形容词和过去分词。
2 even if 引导的是真实条件句，不是虚拟语气。泰坦尼克号已经沉没，哪有和目前事实相反这一说呢？不要一见条件句谓语用了过去形式，就不假思索觉得是虚拟语气。
3 with状语剖析为结果和随着都是可以的。一般而言假如能剖析为结果，则尽可能不剖析为随着。随着状语是实在很难说出是何种状语时用的。
